Sreesanth's homecoming: A throwback in Kerala colours at the seat of World Cup glory

Syed Mustaq Ali game in Mumbai on Monday marked the India pacer’s return to competitive cricket after nearly eight years

Shashank Kishore11-Jan-2021There has been much anticipation around former India pacer Sreesanth’s comeback since September 2020, after his reduced, seven-year life ban in the IPL spot-fixing scandal of 2013 ended. There has been trepidation, too. Can he swing the ball like he once did? Will he have that magical wrist position that many only dreamed of? Will he land them on the seam like he did? At 37, does he still have the pace? What about his fitness?These are all fair questions, whose answers we will only know fully in a month or two, after the current domestic season, which has just started with the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy, finishes. But on the evidence of what you could see of Sreesanth upon his return to competitive cricket on Monday against Puducherry, a full seven-and-a-half years after he last played recognised cricket, you could tick at least four of those boxes.His pace was brisk, but the line a little off in his first over. He conceded two boundaries by bowling leg-stump half-volleys in trying to swing the ball late. As he returned for the second over, it could’ve been easy for him to correct himself. But Sreesanth likes a challenge still. He went wide of the crease, got the ball to angle in full, forced Fabid Ahmed to play forward but got the ball to move away just enough off the pitch to square him up and beat the outside edge to hit middle stump. Not banana swing, but it certainly rekindled memories of old.

His end figures of 1 for 29 off four overs won’t go down in history books as a record spell, but for him and those close to him, who have gone through all that they have over the years, this was the moment they’d been waiting for.

The pace was there, the swing very much visible. It was as if he’d been bowling elsewhere all these years in anticipation of this very day. Sreesanth celebrated the moment in his trademark manner, channeling his inner Usain Bolt, as his team-mates tried to catch up with him. And as they huddled around to ruffle his slightly grey hair, Sreesanth looked up to the heavens, quietly saying a prayer, wiping a tear off his eye and then smiling away on the way back to his run-up, hand on his heart.Much after his spell, Sreesanth was at mid-off, constantly speaking to his bowlers, offering them words of encouragement, giving them a pat on the back, and running up to his captain in between overs to discuss field positions. This was a Sreesanth switched on fully, minus the theatrics of old, but with determination writ large.Was he nervous? Unlikely, because his return was imminent. He had been training hard, shedding muscles to become lean and mean again. He even hired an NBA trainer to help condition himself during lockdown. From as early as June, right in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic, he started training with Kerala’s Under-23 cricketers in Kochi. At no stage did the Kerala Cricket Association (KCA) hide their desire of having him back.The BCCI had imposed a life ban on Sreesanth for his alleged role in the 2013 IPL corruption and spot-fixing scandal•PTI That faith and trust resonated in his body language; he didn’t look like he was a bowler playing to prove a point, but someone just looking to enjoy the experience of returning to the very ground he was banned from, the very city where he was picked up for questioning by the police all those years ago. He also entered the very dressing room where he soaked in the experience of his life on that heady night of April 2, 2011. He didn’t need more inspiration after that.Watching Sreesanth on the field can give you visceral thrill. Go back to that ball to Jacques Kallis at Durban. Or that spell at Johannesburg. Or his mid-pitch jig to irritate Andre Nel after slapping him – no pun intended – down the ground for six. With the ball, you know what he can do, but you also know the Sreesanth of old was often prone to self-destruction, a by-product of his hyperaggression. Either way, as a package, Sreesanth at his best was so sizzling that you couldn’t take your eyes off him when he had the ball in hand. So, you couldn’t help but tune in for this very thrill, a few hours after the Indian team had pulled off a great escape in Sydney, among their most memorable overseas finishes lately.The Sreesanth of old also brought with his bowling some quirky traits. The self-exhortations at the top of his run-up, the self-fist-pumps, as if to calm himself down after every ball, angry growls at batsmen, special celebration, the stares. But those looking for these traits saw a mellower version of the man, who, at 37, wants to be an elder brother for the rest of this Kerala squad. For that, there was a simpler matter of having to earn the respect of his squad through his on-field performances, and it didn’t take him long to strike.On his part, Sreesanth has repeatedly mentioned his desire to play for India again. India’s pace stocks are at an all-time high, and even he knows he is being optimistic to dream of that possibility. But it’s unlikely he would’ve thought of all that as he took the field. His end figures of 1 for 29 off four overs won’t go down in history books as a record spell, but for him and those close to him, who have gone through all that they have over the years, this was the moment they’d been waiting for.

India's pink-ball conundrum: Kuldeep, Hardik, Siraj or Sundar?

Are India better off with a fast-bowling allrounder, a fast bowler, a wristspinner or a spin-bowling allrounder?

Sidharth Monga22-Feb-2021Test selections are never easy. You have to pick a team not only for the conditions at hand on the first day but what you anticipate to happen over the five full days. You also have to provide for losing the toss. You might, for instance in the second Chennai Test, expect that one fast bowler is plenty for the best part of the Test, but you still have to pick two to provide for losing the toss even if that means you are practically playing 10 players for all but two of the sessions.Related

Umesh Yadav added to Test squad, Shardul Thakur released

Graham Thorpe: 'Adapting to the pink ball will be key'

Anderson doesn't expect reverse swing to play a part in day-night Test

Rohit: Need to be 'extra focused' at twilight time in day-night Tests

Ishant Sharma – from unlucky workhorse to master quick

Add to all this the uncertainty a day-night Test brings where the conditions can be a bit of a lottery. There might be dew one night but not another. Captains have a tough task of covering all bases when they hand over their XI to the match referee. It is a sign of India’s strength that they need to debate only one place going into the day-night Test starting Wednesday in Ahmedabad. And that is the place occupied by Kuldeep Yadav in Chennai.The other expected change is Jasprit Bumrah’s return into the XI in Mohammed Siraj’s place. The five batsmen who played in Chennai, Rishabh Pant as wicketkeeper and R Ashwin, Axar Patel, Ishant Sharma and Bumrah are certainties subject to last-minute fitness issues. Here are the options India have for the 11th spot. All of them have a reasonable case for selection.Kuldeep himselfKuldeep bowled just 12.2 overs in the second Test in Chennai, his first in more than two years. In both innings, he was the last man India went to, and he picked two wickets when the match was long over as a contest. With not much contribution expected from his bat, Kuldeep did seem like a luxury in that Test. However, he can only get into a better rhythm over time, and what works in his favour is the constant feedback from domestic cricketers who have played pink-ball cricket in India that wristspinners are difficult to pick in the night.Mohammed SirajAs a second specialist quick, Siraj bowled only eight overs in the Chennai Test for one wicket, but if the conditions – you need to leave extra grass for the pink ball to last – ask for it, India might need three fast bowlers in the side. Siraj, Bumrah and Ishant along with two spinners is the closest India will get to their winning combination in Melbourne. Axar is the closest you can get to Ravindra Jadeja: an accurate fingerspinner who doesn’t give batsmen time to adjust, and someone with promise with the bat. If conditions ask for a third seamer, Siraj is the frontrunner.Umesh Yadav has had an excellent record in home Tests of late, and he is back with the squad, but since he is coming fresh off an injury it remains to be seen if India will feel confident enough to draft him straight into an XI.Hardik PandyaThose present at the Chennai Test say Pandya has been bowling with the pink ball in the nets. If India feel they need their fifth bowler for six-seven overs a day at best and they also need batting depth to cover for pink-ball vagaries, don’t be surprised if Pandya makes his return to Test cricket after an absence of two-and-a-half years.Washington SundarThe other man who spent a lot of time with the pink ball in the nets in Chennai is Washington Sundar. And here are Rohit Sharma’s expectations from the Ahmedabad pitch: “I don’t see anything change [from Chennai]. However it played in the second Test, it’s going to be similar. It’ll turn. We’re preparing accordingly for that, let’s see when the day comes. It’s been a while since international cricket was played here, we’ll see how it goes.”Also, the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy matches in Ahmedabad were spin-dominated. If that continues to be the case, an accurate and quick fingerspinner who can also provide lower-order runs might not be a bad option for a fifth bowler.

Blaming Jonny Bairstow for England's defeat would ignore wider context

Bairstow is only partially culpable for his batting struggles since his recall

George Dobell06-Mar-2021Like taking out your frustrations at the waiting times in A&E upon the receptionist, blaming individual England players for their series loss in India might be understandable, but it’s largely facile.Of course, these results look ugly. And more than the results, the margins of the defeats (317 runs, 10 wickets and an innings and 25 runs respectively) and the paucity of the batting efforts jar: for any team to average 144 over their most recent seven innings is clearly inadequate.Experience suggest that, in such circumstances, there will be casualties. Four of the team that played the Sydney Test of 2014, for example – Michael Carberry, Kevin Pietersen, Scott Borthwick and Boyd Rankin – never played another Test for England.Some will suggest that this defeat should prove a similar watershed moment. And it’s true, a few England players – not least Dom Bess and Jonny Bairstow – may have played their last Test for a while.In such moments, though, it is important to maintain some perspective. Yes, these last three Tests have seen England humbled. And yes, they have exposed faults within the side – and the system – that will take time and effort to remedy. Most pertinently, it will remain desperately tough for England to win in India if they do not learn to bowl and play spin far better.But England had won their previous four series, two of them (in South Africa and Sri Lanka) away from home. They had, until the second Test of this series, won six successive Tests in Asia. Barely a day before the fourth Test ended, it seemed they had earned themselves an unlikely opportunity to level the series. Maybe they simply came up against a better side, in conditions which they rarely encounter. Really, was it realistic to expect them to win?Indeed, there is a strong case to suggest that by winning a Test – a result that proved beyond them on their previous tour of India – England exceeded expectations. In this era, it is hard to think of any XI that England could have put out which would have won this series. England face a significant challenge to retain their impressive home record when India travel to play them later in the year.No doubt, their rest and rotation policy caused some issues. But possibly fewer issues than if there had been no such policy. Who knows how many of this squad might have chosen to miss the tour without it? Or even opt out of Test cricket altogether? It’s unrealistic to expect players to forego opportunities in the IPL or to spend up to five months in a biosecure bubble. Rest and rotation doesn’t just seem responsible; it seems essential.This England team is clearly far from perfect. One or two areas are in urgent need of attention. But if anyone thinks there are loads of obviously better candidates in county cricket they are deluding themselves. The truth is much grimmer than that.Consider this, for example: when was the last time the county game produced a top-three batsman who proved an undisputed success at Test level? You could argue it was Joe Root (who averages 39.16 in the top three) who made his Test debut in 2012. Perhaps it was Jonathan Trott (42.94) who made his debut in 2009, or Alastair Cook (45.17) who made his debut in 2006. But either way, it’s been a long time. There are no quick fixes to the problems facing English cricket.Perhaps that context is most important in evaluating the career of Bairstow. His first-ball dismissal here, flicking one to leg slip, betrayed a mind scrambled by doubt and failure. And you can understand why: it was his third duck in four innings in this series, and meant that, in his most recent nine Test innings against India, he had failed to score on six occasions, with a top score of 28 and an average of 5.77.It’s not just against India that he has struggled. Since May 2018, Bairstow has averaged 23.17 in 22 Tests. For a man who averages 50.74 in first-class cricket for Yorkshire – a benchmark that is likely to prove beyond any of those who may replace him – that is a troubling level of under-achievement. It is entirely possible that he has played his last Test.Bairstow has struggled in Tests since May 2018•Getty ImagesThat date – May 2018 – is relevant, though. For that was when Bairstow was asked to move up the order. It was an intriguing decision: Bairstow had, over the past two-and-a-half years, averaged 47.07 with the bat in Test cricket. In 2016 alone, he had scored 1,470 runs, a record for a Test keeper in a calendar year. He had improved significantly with the gloves, too. His role wasn’t really a weakness that required strengthening.But England wanted to find room for Jos Buttler. And fearing that he might struggle in the top or even middle order – where most specialist batsmen might be expected to play – they picked him as a No. 7.The problem with that was, England already had several players who looked at their best at No. 6 or No. 7. And with Ben Stokes locked in at No. 6 at the time, Bairstow had to be promoted to No. 5.

Later, when Buttler struggled to merit a spot as a specialist batsman (he averaged just 25.10 in 2019), Bairstow relinquished the gloves – more accurately, they had to be torn off his hands – so Buttler’s continued selection could be justified. As a result, Bairstow found himself in the side as a specialist batsman and, at times, obliged to bat as high as No. 3.There’s a reason why Bairstow made his name batting in the middle order for Yorkshire. For all his ability, he is less confident against the Dukes ball when it is at its hardest and most helpful for bowlers. While his propensity to push at the ball is often an asset in limited-overs cricket, where the white ball hardly moves laterally, and in first-class games when the ball is a little softer, it is a potential weakness against higher-quality, quicker bowlers or spinners. At Test level, he averages 42.66 at No. 6 and 42.35 at No. 7, but only 27.74 at No. 5 and 30.76 at No. 3. Only one of his six Test centuries has come above No. 6 in the order.His temperament is relevant, too. Like many allrounders, Bairstow flourishes in the knowledge that, if he is struggling with one discipline of his game, he can still contribute with the other. Until May 2018, Bairstow appeared to feel secure and valued in this side.After that? Well, the statistics tell the story, really. You could argue that any Test player has to learn to play the moving ball and adapt to the needs of the team, and the prioritisation of Buttler has been vindicated by his improvement in the last year. But you would probably also have to accept that Bairstow was going along very nicely until he was destabilised by the latest bit of whimsy from selectors who claim they use data but give every indication of simply manipulating it to justify the prioritisation of their latest favourite.Related

  • Bess' struggles symptomatic of England's sickly spin system

  • India set up WTC final clash with New Zealand

  • Stats: One of England's worst batting series since 1909

  • 'No excuses' says Root as England face up to being 'outskilled'

  • 4th Test, 3rd day – As it happened

How else can you explain the selection of Jason Roy as a Test opener? Or the selection of Ollie Pope to bat higher for England than he ever had for Surrey? Or the selection of Somerset’s second-choice spinner who averages 47 with the ball in the Second XI Championship? Bairstow isn’t a No. 3; judging him on his record there is like judging a racehorse on its ability to swim.The job of a team’s management is to provide a settled, calm environment in which a player is given the best chance to fulfil their potential. Bairstow has been shunted out of position, had his role changed and asked to adjust to accommodate other players – and he is hardly alone in having suffered that fate. Yes, he has failed to make that adjustment. But England’s management are at least partially culpable for sowing the seeds of doubt and asking him to fulfil a role for which he was poorly suited and ill-trained.None of this means the England selectors should necessarily retain faith in him. But it does mean that they should be realistic about whoever replaces him, and should provide them with a better chance to fulfil their potential. Playing against this quality of opposition will always be tough; doing it when you are insecure in your role and your position is almost impossible.Blaming the players for the manner of England’s series defeat may be understandable. But if English cricket actually wants to see change, it’s the administration and management that requires attention.

We can't keep asking more of our stars, but with Joe Root in this zone, who would want it to end?

In-form captain has team-mates running out of superlatives and home crowd loving every moment

Andrew Miller14-Aug-20216:00

Root or KP – England’s greatest batsman?

We cannot keep asking more of our star players. That has been the message from the ECB high command in recent months – including on the eve of this Test, when Tom Harrison, the chief executive, insisted the board were committed to a “people first” policy, for the remainder of England’s summer campaign and, most significantly, on into this winter’s Ashes.”It’s no longer acceptable to go ‘once more unto the breach dear friends’,” Harrison said, with Covid restrictions foremost in his thoughts, but with England’s insane itinerary right up there at the top of everyone else’s. For despite such stirring rhetoric, there really is no other way. The reality for England’s cricketers, in the sport’s post-pandemic panic, is that every day is Groundhog Day, every next-biggest occasion ever is just another day on the treadmill.But just as Bill Murray discovered while hanging out in Punxsutawney, some days can still be better than others if you can find it within you to seize the moment. And when you’ve ploughed on for as long as Joe Root has, willing yourself to perform in empty echoing stadiums for months of bubbled-up existence, then to emerge into a sunlight Saturday of a Lord’s Test, in front of a packed and enraptured crowd, with your own family looking on from their box in the Grandstand … well, there couldn’t really be a more perfect stage for a masterpiece.Related

Stats: Joe Root reaches 9000 Test runs as superb 2021 form continues

Joe Root's flawless 180* helps England edge 27 ahead

India refuse to go on the back foot thanks to Mohammed Siraj, Ishant Sharma and Jasprit Bumrah

Root has had plenty reason to wave his bat in triumph in the course of his extraordinary 2021. But few milestone moments have dripped with more glee than his jab into the covers off Jasprit Bumrah, armed with the second new ball on Saturday afternoon. He scampered the single then veered abruptly towards his family in the stands, punching the air with a delirium that only the most devout can know.For Root isn’t just going to the well for England, time and time again. He’s living in the well. He’s so immersed in the day-to-day pressures of carrying the fortunes of his team that he’s become at one with his surroundings, at peace with the pressure of treading water for hours at an end, knowing that if he dares to stop swimming, everyone is liable to sink. Today he soared, and it was glorious.”Joe and I, when we were walking out, we were just smiling at each other,” Jonny Bairstow said at the close, after an innings of 57 that ended up being less than a third of his captain’s tally, but is still, remarkably, the only other half-century to have come from one of his team-mates this series.”How good is it to walk out on a Saturday at Lord’s, with one of your best mates?” Bairstow added. “That’s exactly what it was. Our partnership was about having fun while we were out there, and to have a full crowd back at Lord’s, with the new stand, with family and friends, was really special. That Lord’s buzz, or hum, or however you want to phrase it, was most definitely back.”Mohammed Siraj congratulates Joe Root on his unbeaten 180•Getty ImagesMuch like James Anderson’s first-innings five-for, hindsight confers an inevitability on Root’s magnificence that circumstance really shouldn’t allow. It was a point put to him in the lead-up to this match – as he opted once again to do his captain’s media duties two days out from the Test, in a bid to cocoon his game-brain and filter out the noise for an extra 24 hours.”How are you Joe?” was the gist of the final question, almost as an afterthought at the end of a 20-minute interrogation, featuring topics including the return of Moeen Ali and the wider failings of a team that had been outplayed in each of their first three Tests of the summer, the longest they’d been made to wait for a home victory since their struggles against Sri Lanka and India back in 2014.He insisted he was fine – but then so too, you suspect, did Ben Stokes last month, when he fielded that SOS after the white-ball Covid outbreak, and broke off his recuperation to lead out a squad of reserves. Today, however, Root offered up the most ringing affirmative he could muster, an innings so serene it was as though the solitude of his supremacy had bought even his classically tailored game an extra yard of response time.Soft hands, calm choices, unhurried strokeplay – at least until his white-ball savvy surged to the fore as Anderson got peppered in the day’s frantic closing moments. He barely presented a straight bat through the V at any stage of his innings, relying instead on nudges off his legs for the balls that veered too straight, and needle-threading judgement on his favoured off-side, which made a mockery at times of Virat Kohli’s attempts to bung up his options with a trio of short covers and two slips to check his dab to third man.And in keeping with the need to think happy thoughts to haul England through this summer’s predicament, Root’s running between the wickets was able to step up an extra notch once he had linked up with sidekicks in whom he could fully trust – Bairstow in the first instance, but Jos Buttler and Moeen Ali too, a trio whose white-ball world-beating counts for more than perhaps it ought to in the cramped confines of this itinerary. In the end Bairstow was bested by the short ball – a method he cannot really plan for when ruling the roost in one-day cricket – while Buttler and Moeen made just 50 runs between them. But they between scratched out half-century stands, and gave Root the ballast he needed to drag the match towards parity.None of this is sustainable. It’s barely even credible – much as in 2018, when India’s 4-1 losing margin was a travesty, it beggars belief that they are not already 1-0 up from Trent Bridge, and pushing for a second. But like a high-wire act over Niagara Falls, Root’s progress is both utterly compelling, and so inexorable, you start to believe he might just get to the other side without looking down.

“I run out of superlatives, to be honest”Jonny Bairstow marvels at the feats of his captain

For his achievements in 2021 are already sensational. In the course of this innings, Root first skittered past Graham Gooch’s former England record of 8900 Test runs, then pushed on past 9000 too, and at a younger age than anyone bar the one Englishman ahead of him in the run-charts, Alastair Cook.By the time he’d run out of partners on 180 not out, Root’s tally for the year was close to double that of any other batter in world cricket – 1244 to Rohit Sharma’s mid-match tally of 669 – and while England’s overloaded itinerary is a contributory factor, the comparison with his peers is even more revealing.By the end of England’s innings, Root had scored almost four times as many runs in 2021 as his next most prolific team-mate, Rory Burns (353), and more runs than the rest of England’s top six in this match combined.He’s made five of their six centuries this year, including each of their four 150-plus scores, and is only one shy of England’s all-time record of six in a calendar year. And, as if further proof was needed of the burden he has carried for his side, in this match he even had to see off two hat-trick balls in the same innings. His first ball came in the wake of Haseeb Hameed’s golden duck on Friday; and his 277th came 152 runs later, as Ishant Sharma started a new over, fresh from delivering Sam Curran his own first-baller.”I run out of superlatives, to be honest,” Bairstow said at the close. “He means a heck of a lot [to the team], like he does to English cricket.”To go into second place in the leading run-scorers in the history of the English game is very special, to pass 9000 Test runs in this game is extremely special, to score another 180 not out at Lord’s is great, isn’t it, and to see him in the form that he is, playing the way he is, it’s awesome to be out there with him, putting on partnerships with him, and enjoying every single moment of it.”And as a consequence, he’s on the brink of his masterpiece now. A year to stand comparison with any of the greats that have gone before. Richards in 1976, Ponting in 2005… even the most prolific of them all, Mohammad Yousuf, whose 1788 runs in his annus mirablis in 2006 included nine centuries in 19 innings. That’s as many as Root himself has now played, but he’s still got 12 more scheduled before the New Year. As might have been mentioned once or twice, England’s itinerary really is something else.But more immediately, Root’s got the chance to prove a point about his contemporary credentials. The mutterings in recent seasons were that he had slipped out of the fabled “Fab Four” of modern batting – his century at Trent Bridge last week had been his first on home soil since India’s last tour in 2018, notwithstanding the fact that his role in England’s World Cup triumph had caused a wavering in his Test focus.But now it’s Kohli who’s feeling the heat for his own relative dip in standards. In consecutive series against England in 2016-17 and 2018, he amassed the small matter of 655 runs at 109.16, and 593 at 59.30. Likewise, Steve Smith racked up 687 runs at 137.40 in Australia’s 4-0 rout in their last home Ashes in 2017-18; then followed that up with 774 more at 110.57.Root, right at this moment, has 353 runs at 176.50, with potentially seven more innings to come. The same, in fact, as his next most prolific colleague for the entire year. It may not be fair to expect Root to keep giving more to the cause. But when you’re in a zone quite like this, who would ever wish it to end?

Something's missing, but Sunil Narine keeps finding a way

The intense scrutiny of his action has taken away the big turn, but he’s reinvented himself and remains hugely influential

Alagappan Muthu24-Sep-20212:53

Dasgupta: KKR’s plan to use fast bowlers against Mumbai’s middle order worked well

The Mohawk is still there. The bling too. And those full sleeves? Yeah, he probably wears them in the shower. Everything that makes Sunil Narine makes him box-office.But there’s something missing.He remains one of the Kolkata Knight Riders’ go-to bowlers. An architect of wickets and victories. The one he took on Thursday night was crucial to an all-round performance that keeps the play-off dream alive.But there’s something missing.He came on to bowl as early as the third over against Mumbai Indians. In his third over, the 10th of the innings, he brought down Rohit Sharma.But there’s something missing.The wicket was the result of extra bounce. Rohit had set up to slog-sweep a ball that got big on him and ended up caught at long-on.But there’s something mis–that’s it!Why is Narine relying on something as subtle as extra bounce?Think back. Back to 2012, when Kolkata Knight Riders signed this miracle worker for more than 10 times his base price. Back to those times that no one knew how, if and which way the ball would turn. There’s this curly-haired chap who always hangs out in the Mumbai dugout these days. Ask him about how he once tried to play a cover drive to a ball a bolt of lightning that ripped right through and cuh-lean bowled him.

Watch the IPL on ESPN+

Sign up for ESPN+ and catch all the action from the IPL live in the US. Match highlights of Mumbai Indians vs Kolkata Knight Riders is available here in English, and here in Hindi (US only).

Narine was in his first over that night in 2013 when he made Sachin Tendulkar look like he didn’t belong. He was a spinner at the top of his game. A magician in whose hands the ball went from being just a piece of leather into a force of nature.All that has changed now. The crippling scrutiny on his bowling action – he has run into trouble at both IPL level and higher – has forced Narine to let go of some of his tricks. And it’s been tough. Perhaps even overwhelming. Why else would a player of his quality choose to withdraw from a World Cup?Eoin Morgan and Sunil Narine celebrate Rohit Sharma’s dismissal•BCCIThere are those who are skeptical of the ICC and the way they police suspect actions. Saqlain Mushtaq, for one, has often wondered how the 15-degree flex rule even came to be. And Mohammad Hafeez thinks there’s something fishy in the way some bowlers keep getting called up repeatedly and some just aren’t.Narine couldn’t be bothered with conspiracy theories. Like Joey if he could no longer say ‘how you doin’ or Courage if he could no longer be the cowardly dog, he had to find a way to reinvent himself. And so this new avatar was born.In the 2012 IPL, because of the way his balls turned big, turned quick and turned in every which way, he generated a false shot roughly once every three deliveries. Nine years later, relying on subtlety rather than mystery, Narine remains a nuisance, drawing a false shot once every four deliveries.This is how he was able to bounce back from conceding 11 off his first over to giving up just four, three and two (plus a leg bye) off his next three overs, while dismissing Rohit and sucking precious momentum out of a Mumbai innings that had gotten off to a flier.”I’m coming off a good amount of cricket,” Narine said while picking up the Player-of-the-Match award, “The Hundred, CPL and out here. It’s been a while since I’ve played so much cricket and I’m happy to be playing as much as possible. I’ve put a lot of work into my action and it’s getting better and better. So just to be able to continue the good work and hopefully I can get in good performances that contribute to my team’s victory.”But there’s something missing.And it’s okay. Because although Narine at his peak was an absolute spectacle, the one we have now might be just as good. He is a reminder that no matter what comes your way, you just never give up.

Rohit Sharma's ascent to ODI captaincy predictable and sensible

There is intrigue in the way the BCCI has handled and communicated the removal of Kohli, but that is not new with the board

Sidharth Monga09-Dec-2021India once had a captain, Player A. One of his main batters, Player B, pulled out of a big match at the last moment. India lost the match. Player A, among India’s greatest of all time, then found out from a journalist that he was being sacked as captain. “Whom are they giving it to?” Player A asked, and lost it when told that Player B was going to be the new captain.We haven’t reached that kind of suspected palace intrigue, but it is just a reminder to not get fooled by the MS Dhoni-N Srinivasan blind faith: India’s captaincy has always been a precarious job. You get absolute power when in the job, but you can be dumped just as unceremoniously. It used to be through a journalist earlier – even till the time of Sachin Tendulkar – and it is one line of a postscript in a press release about something else these days.Let us not mistake it: intrigue there is aplenty. India have essentially removed – statistically – one of the most successful captains in ODI cricket, a 33-year-old, who openly and calculatedly made public his desire to keep captaining India in ODIs when he gave up the T20I leadership three months back. The change is not made with long-term future in mind: in fact, the new captain is a year-and-a-half older.Related

Kohli: Was told I wouldn't be ODI captain hour-and-a-half before SA Test squad was announced

Rohit: 'There was clear grit and determination to win every game' under Kohli's captaincy

Rohit Sharma: I want middle order to prepare for '10 for 3' situations

Sourav Ganguly: 'Had requested Virat not to step down as T20I captain'

Rohit replaces Kohli as ODI captain, takes over from Rahane as Test vice-captain

It is hard to think of an India captain who achieved full-time captaincy for the first time when older than Rohit Sharma’s 34-and-a-half. Anil Kumble got it at 37, but he was clearly a stop-gap as MS Dhoni found his bearings as the limited-overs captain. That appointment was necessitated by Rahul Dravid’s resignation; this one has been initiated by the BCCI.Any captaincy change in Indian cricket has to be ratified by the board president. So right now, the selectors and the BCCI president clearly believe there is a better captain in Indian cricket than the one under whom India won five matches for every two they lost and under whom they went to the final and the semi-final of the two world events they took part in.However, it is possible too that the selectors and the BCCI have looked beyond the record. Apart from the T20 World Cups, which are a tough format, you expect any Indian team – given the quality of any given side – to make the knockouts of world events because they are designed to discourage upsets. Having said that, it can’t be ignored that India did so comprehensively.Under Virat Kohli, India took the bold step of doing away with two fingerspinners, two of India’s biggest match-winners in the years leading up to it, but they were late to it: India were the only side in the 2017 Champions Trophy without a wristspinner. Now if it was the selectors who didn’t yield or if it was the team management that was caught napping we will probably never know.During the 2019 World Cup, India found themselves with a back-up allrounder with no experience of anchoring ODI innings and then a wicketkeeper-batter whom they didn’t originally want•IDI via Getty ImagesThe 2019 World Cup was more disappointing. At the start of 2018, Ajinkya Rahane was supposed to be India’s No. 4 despite Dhoni’s astute assessment that he struggles once the field is spread and the ball is old. Then Ambati Rayudu came in and proved himself only to be dropped after one ordinary series right before the World Cup. During the event, India found themselves with a back-up allrounder with no prior experience of anchoring ODI innings and then a wicketkeeper-batter whom they didn’t originally want at the World Cup suddenly playing that pivotal role. It was just their luck that it came down to the middle order in a big match.Of course, the selectors and the BCCI need not make any such explanations because Kohli all but decided his fate by giving up the T20I captaincy. It makes more sense to have one man leading both the limited-overs sides than two. It is in that format that Kohli was more vulnerable, given his IPL record and lack of role clarity in the national side. Rohit’s sides have had clearer roles and plans for its players. He is not shy to use data inputs. Kohli runs on emotion; Rohit seeks to take emotion out of it.Yet if these were the arguments, why it took the BCCI two-and-a-half years after the 2019 World Cup is anybody’s guess. Kohli’s lack of runs, for one, makes this call easier and less unpopular. A 2012 Yuvraj Singh advert comes too close to reality: “Till the bat talks, the world is yours.” It was only when Dhoni was struggling with the bat that he received the tap on his shoulder in 2017 and jumped before being pushed. But Kohli, possibly, still believed in himself as the ODI captain and refused to jump.It is never not uncomfortable, though. It is clear now that Kohli didn’t want to move on, which always makes it a little awkward for the new captain for wanting the job and now having to lead the former leader. It is not unnatural either. These are ambitious, competitive men who have come this far because they haven’t acknowledged self-doubt. The success of the team environment that Kohli is proud of building will lie in how maturely they move on from here. That yes, we respect each other’s ambitions, that it is perfectly natural and that we are mature enough to not carry on with this.Coach Dravid has previously been caught in similar crosshairs when the BCCI last sacked an India captain. This is different. Kohli still has the Test captaincy. Kohli still has the record and the fitness. There is no coach whom players see as a threat. Kohli the captain has backed Rohit the batter; there is no reason to suspect Rohit the captain doesn’t feel the same about Kohli the batter. Although purely from the outside, it has always seemed that Kohli and Rohit are one similar batter too many for a T20 top three.Most importantly, India remain a highly successful side in all formats never mind the T20 World Cup exit. Equally importantly, this is done well in time for Rohit to get a certain number of games in so that he can build his own side for the 2023 World Cup. It also gives Kohli more time to work on his batting. It is not appreciated nearly enough how taxing it can be to captain India in three formats and also an IPL side.Yet this is a transition that needs to be handled delicately, but not one that Dravid, Kohli and Rohit can’t see through.

Indians at the WBBL: Shafali Verma blows hot and cold, and Poonam Yadav rediscovers her mojo

Harmanpreet Kaur made an eventful debut for the Renegades, while Richa Ghosh has impressed for the Hurricanes

Annesha Ghosh21-Oct-2021Harmanpreet KaurA dropped catch of Ruth Johnston that briefly turned into an injury scare while fielding, a wicket of India team-mate Richa Ghosh in her first over, and then the run-out of Naomi Stalenberg with a wrong-handed underarm throw from backward point… a busy first day at Harmanpreet’s second WBBL team ended with her sealing the Melbourne Renegades’ chase of 122 against the Hobart Hurricanes with a four in the final over.Having received a reprieve on 10, when an lbw appeal should have gone medium-pacer Nicola Carey’s way at the start of the 19th over, Harmanpreet carted 14 off her next six balls, including a mighty six off Carey. If her 19-ball 24 in the Renegades’ opening win offered glimpses of Harmanpreet the finisher, whom India have missed in the recent past, her 37-ball 41 in Renegades’ next outing against the Adelaide Strikers anchored a rebuild after they had lost their top three inside the first 10 overs.Jemimah RodriguesOpening alongside Sophie Molineux, Rodrigues top-scored on WBBL debut, against the Hurricanes, marrying timing with placement in her 34-ball 33 while also stitching a vital second-wicket stand of 68 with Courtney Webb. Her commanding use of feet and improved power game, which had been on view through her breakout Hundred campaign and the T20I leg of the multi-format India tour of Australia, were on show in the six-wicket win over the Hurricanes.In the Renegades’ second game, however, she couldn’t get going, hitting just one four in a 17-ball 12 before slog-sweeping legspinner Amanda-Jade Wellington straight to mid-on. Ever the livewire in the field, though, Rodrigues put up an impressive exhibition of boundary-riding, diving around to save runs in what would ultimately be an unsuccessful defence of 126 against the Strikers.Shafali VermaFor all the fear the very name of the gum-chewing, big-hitting Shafali evokes even among the most formidable attacks, the teenager has time and again needed hiding in the field. No wonder, then, that social media went into a tizzy when her rocket throw from short midwicket, with just one stump to aim at, caught the Melbourne Stars’ Annabel Sutherland short of her ground at the non-striker’s end in the Sydney Sixers’ curtain-raiser.

With the bat, Shafali has gone either big or bust so far in her first WBBL season. A Player-of-the-Match-winning 50-ball 57 against the Hurricanes was bookended by two appearances against Stars in which she fell for 8 and 0. Intangible gains, however, may outweigh scoresheet testimonials if getting advice from her opening partner Alyssa Healy, and throwdowns from her captain Ellyse Perry, are considered. “[To] learn from the cricketers like Healy and Perry, it’s so good for me,” Verma said after scoring her maiden WBBL fifty.Radha YadavThe Sixers’ other Indian recruit, the left-arm spinner Radha Yadav, got her WBBL career underway with an 11-run over in the powerplay in the rain-reduced 11-overs-a-side season-opener against the Stars. She only conceded four off her next over, but went wicketless.A more eye-catching performance followed in the win against the Hurricanes: she snaffled a sharp one-handed catch at point to dismiss Mignon du Preez before she decisively dented the opposition’ innings with a double-wicket 18th over. In the space of three balls, she took out set batters Sasha Moloney and Ghosh, having them caught for 22 and 46 respectively.Her most economical returns came in the return fixture against the Stars, in which she finished with 0 for 17 in four overs. An opportunity to showcase her lower-order hitting skills arose later, at No. 8, but a 6-ball 2 was all she could muster before being bowled.Richa GhoshComing off an impressive ODI debut and a decent showing in the T20Is against Australia, Ghosh’s stocks as a street-smart batter continued to rise in the WBBL after the Hurricanes signed her as a last-minute replacement pick. The combination of ingenuity, power and hand-eye coordination that has been the hallmark of her career so far shone through in her 14-ball 21 against the Renegades and her run-a-ball 46 against the Sixers, though both came in losing causes.Richa Ghosh is behind only Rachel Priest in the six-hitting charts this season•Getty ImagesUsed purely as a batter, specifically at No. 4, her four sixes are second only to Rachel Priest’s seven in the competition so far. With Priest retaining the gloves, Ghosh, who kept wickets in India’s recent limited-overs assignments, was put to test in the circle and the outfield and was up to the task for the most part, even firing in a direct-hit to run out the Renegades captain Molineux after shelling a tough chance off Rodrigues off the same ball.Poonam YadavThe talisman of India’s spin attack until not long ago, Poonam’s wristspin has waned in efficacy of late, forcing her to warm the bench for five out of India’s seven matches in Australia. Come the WBBL, however, and Poonam’s loopy legbreak, unassuming straighter one, and potent-when-not-overutilised wrong’un were back.Two wickets apiece in her first two outings in the competition, after she came in as a late replacement for New Zealand’s Amelia Kerr, shot Poonam to the top of Brisbane Heat’s wicket charts. The prize wicket in her haul so far was of the dangerous Beth Mooney, bowled for 40, in the first face-off between Heat and the Perth Scorchers. With the 2022 ODI World Cup around the corner, both Heat and India stand to benefit if Poonam could build on her strong start to the WBBL campaign.Deepti SharmaIn defending champions Sydney Thunder’s solitary appearance in the week gone by, little went their way, or the way of their two Indian imports. The allrounder Deepti Sharma, making her first appearance in the WBBL, struck in her first over, accounting for South Africa and Adelaide Strikers batter Laura Wolvaardt, but was otherwise costly, finishing with 4-0-32-1. Later, when Thunder needed a middle-order rearguard to resuscitate their botched pursuit of 140, Deepti, slotting in at No. 6, only managed 4 off 6.Smriti MandhanaLike Deepti, India and Thunder opener Smriti Mandhana got her first season for her new club underway with only four runs to her name. Like her many dismissals since landing in Australia two months ago, Mandhana’s undoing this time around also came about in the point region. In the absence of Rachael Haynes, Thunder will rely on the experienced Mandhana to hit the ground running early in week two.

Stats – Alyssa Healy and Australia smash World Cup records

The highest score in a World Cup final. The first 300-plus total in a World Cup final. The highest partnership in a World Cup final. And more

Sampath Bandarupalli03-Apr-2022170 Alyssa Healy’s score against England. It is now the highest individual score for any batter in a World Cup final (men or women), surpassing Adam Gilchrist’s 149 against Sri Lanka in 2007.ESPNcricinfo Ltd356 for 5 Australia’s total is the first-ever instance of a 300-plus total in a Women’s ODI World Cup final. The previous highest was only 259 for 7 by Australia in 2013 against West Indies. Australia’s 356 is also the second-highest total in a World Cup final (men or women), behind the 359 for 2 by the Australian men’s team against India in 2003.ESPNcricinfo Ltd3 This 356 is Australia’s third-highest total in Women’s ODIs. They posted 412 for 3 in the 1997 World Cup against Denmark and 397 for 4 against Pakistan earlier in the same year. This is also the highest Women’s ODI total against England. Australia broke their own record, which they set at the start of the tournament with 310 for 3 in Hamilton.2 Healy’s 170 is the second-highest score in Women’s ODIs for Australia, behind Belinda Clark’s 229* in the 1997 World Cup against Denmark. It is the highest score by any batter against England in this format, going past Clark’s 146* in 2000.

1 Healy became the first player to score two hundreds in the knockouts of an ODI World Cup. She scored 129 against West Indies in the semi-final in Wellington. Only two players before her had multiple tons in World Cup knockouts – Ricky Ponting (2003 final and 2011 quarter-final) and Mahela Jayawardene (2007 semi-final and 2011 final).509 Runs by Healy in this tournament, the first player with 500-plus runs in an edition of the Women’s ODI World Cup. The 497 runs made by Rachael Haynes in this tournament is the second-highest tally in a Women’s World Cup. The opening duo from Australia broke the record held by Debbie Hockley with 456 runs in 1997.ESPNcricinfo Ltd170 Healy’s innings is also the highest individual score by a wicketkeeper in Women’s ODIs. The previous highest was Rachel Priest’s 157 against Sri Lanka in 2015.2 Australia’s innings is only the second in Women’s ODI history to feature two 150-plus partnerships. The first such instance was also featured Australia when they hit 397 for 4 against Pakistan in 1997. The two partnerships involving Healy – 160 with Haynes and 156 with Beth Mooney are the highest stands in the Women’s ODI World Cup finals.ESPNcricinfo Ltd148* Nat Sciver’s score against Australia, the second-highest individual score in a Women’s ODI chase. The highest is 152* by Meg Lanning against Sri Lanka during the 2017 World Cup in Bristol.641 Runs between Australia and England in the final, the second-highest match aggregate in Women’s ODI cricket. The highest is 678 runs during the 2017 World Cup game between England and South Africa in Bristol.ESPNcricinfo Ltd2 Instances of two 140-plus scores in a Women’s ODI, before Healy and Sciver in Christchurch. Both the previous instances came in Bristol during the 2017 World Cup – Chamari Athapaththu (178*) and Meg Lanning (152*) during the game between Australia and Sri Lanka, while England’s Tammy Beaumont (148) and Sarah Taylor (147) against South Africa.

Khawaja unfazed by 'special' return to Pakistan: 'I'm not out here to prove anything'

“There is a bit of sentiment, definitely, but once the game starts you don’t really think about that stuff”

Andrew McGlashan28-Feb-2022Usman Khawaja is aware of the significance of his return to Pakistan as part of the first Australia Test team to visit the country in 24 years, but won’t be treating the opening contest in Rawalpindi, close to where he was born in Islamabad, as any different to the multitude of other matches he has played.Khawaja last visited the country with his family in 2010 and after a sliding doors moment during the recent Ashes, he returns as one of Australia’s incumbent openers, so could walk out on the opening morning of the game on Friday.Related

Usman Khawaja's Test renaissance down to being daring and being himself

Australia in Pakistan: PCB, CA and security agencies investigate and dismiss threat against Ashton Agar

Australia's tour of Pakistan 'a big moment for global cricket'

Pakistan lose Hasan Ali, Faheem Ashraf to injury for first Test

'I feel incredibly safe,' Cummins says

Had it not been for Travis Head’s positive Covid-19 result before the Sydney Test in January, Khawaja may well have been carrying the drinks at the start of the series. Instead he scored twin centuries at the SCG which left him undroppable, so the selectors shifted him to open alongside David Warner at the expense of Marcus Harris.He spoke with great eloquence on Monday, Australia’s first full day in the country, and answered a couple of questions in Urdu during a 30-minute press conference that almost became a life story. But, as he said, once the game starts and there’s a bowler running in nothing else matters.”Any game is just a game of cricket,” he said. “I’ve played it for such a long time now, been out of the team, now back in the team, [so] every game for me for Australia is just a bonus. I’m not out here to prove anything…got lot a lot of things in my life which are great that aren’t cricket related so for me it’s not the be-all and end-all. Just love playing cricket, love being competitive.”The fact I’m playing in Pakistan is special, don’t me wrong, it’s very special, something I’ve always want to do. I grew up down the road. There is a bit of sentiment, definitely, but once the game starts you don’t really think about that stuff. More worried about the ball coming down and everything else going on.”Khawaja’s mother and father are unable to travel from Australia for the series and the strict security around the team means he won’t be able to meet the many family and friends he has in the country. He expects a warm response from the crowds – although knows they’ll want Australia to lose – and is grateful how the stars have aligned for his chance at this experience.”I’m sure I’ll look back on it and think that was pretty cool, the first tour of Pakistan after so many years, being born in Pakistan,” he said. “As fate would have it everything has worked out beautifully – touchwood, I don’t hurt myself before the Test match – so things have worked out really well, but it’s hard to become too reminiscent at the time because you’ve still got to play a game of cricket.”Usman Khawaja scored his first Test ton in Asia against Pakistan, in 2018•Getty ImagesAlthough it is a considerable time since Australia have played in Asia (they haven’t toured overseas for a Test series anywhere since 2019), Khawaja produced one of his finest Test performances when these sides met in the UAE in 2018. It was part of an upturn in Khawaja’s record on the subcontinent – which also included ODI success in India – after a difficult start where he did not pass 26 in his first nine Test innings in Asia.”I took the onus on myself that I wasn’t going to listen to anyone else about how I need to bat on the subcontinent,” he said. “I tried that, failed. So I made sure I did learn from it. It wasn’t just a one-off in Dubai, have done it time and time again for different teams. It was a lot of work that went into it. If I didn’t have those experiences I probably wouldn’t be able to develop my game. In Sri Lanka and Bangladesh I probably didn’t understand what I need to do in those conditions.”In terms of preparing for the opening Test, Australia’s lead-in is short even by the standards of modern touring and the impacts of the pandemic. They will have their first training session on Tuesday, just three days before the series begins, although they did tailor their practice in Melbourne to subcontinent conditions with spin nets and a focus on reverse swing.”We’ve been on a lot of subcontinent tours where we’ve had two weeks preparation and still not done great, so maybe this is the way to go,” Khawaja said. “We’ll just have to wait and see. There’s only so much you can train before a Test anyway, so I’m actually quite looking forward to a short build-up this time and seeing how it goes. Could be a blessing in disguise, who knows, or it might not.”

Bidding wars at the IPL: Which team bid the most/least successfully? Which player attracted the most attention?

Also, which Indian domestic team produced the biggest earners? An analysis of all the bids made at the IPL 2022 auction

Sampath Bandarupalli16-Feb-2022The most frequent paddle-raisers
Chennai Super Kings were the most active team at the auction – bidding for 50 players – although they bought only 21. Delhi Capitals are second on this list, with at least one bid for 49 players. Royal Challengers Bangalore bid for the least number of players: 35 – and they bought 19 of them. Kolkata Knight Riders were the most effective franchise at the auction table, with a success rate of 55.26% – having bought 21 players of the 37 for whom they made bids.ESPNcricinfo LtdSunrisers often fall short
Sunrisers Hyderabad entered the auction with the second-highest purse of INR 68 crore. Their moves at the auction table reflected this as they came close to buying most of the players who earned high bids. But they couldn’t clinch many of these deals, ending up as the losing bidder for 17 players – the most for any team – out of 30.In terms of success percentage as one of the final two bidders, only Rajasthan Royals had lower success than Sunrisers – 10 winning bids versus 14 runners-up bids. Royal Challengers had the best success rate, buying 11 out of 18 players for whom they were one of the last two bidders.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe most popular players
Fast bowler Avesh Khan, the first uncapped player to touch the INR 10-crore mark in the history of IPL auctions, received the most number of bids this time around. Five teams were in contention to buy him. He started with a base price of INR 20 lakh, and, many minutes later, it was Lucknow Super Giants who made the 62nd and final bid to secure his services.The most expensive player of the auction, Ishan Kishan, had 55 bids from four different franchises.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe most franchises involved in bidding for one player was six. This happened on three occasions, for Deepak Hooda, R Sai Kishore and Tim David. Nine players attracted bids from five different franchises at this auction.ESPNcricinfo LtdStriking at base price
Ninety-one players were snapped up at their base price. The team that secured the most players at base price was Knight Riders – they made 13 such buys. The fewest such buys was seven each by Sunrisers, Capitals and Gujarat Titans.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe mean multiplier of base price of the players (that is, the average number of times over base price a team went to secure their players) bought by Knight Riders at this auction was 2.78, only more than Super Kings’ 2.33. The highest was Sunrisers’ 6.27 – they bought three players at least 20 times their base price.

Domestic T20 champions earn the most
Tamil Nadu won the previous two editions of India’s domestic T20 tournament, the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy, and fell a run short of the title the year before that. Their consistency in the T20 format translated into their players earning hefty prices at the IPL auction. INR 39.55 crore was spent on 13 players from Tamil Nadu, the biggest amount spent on players from any Indian domestic team.ESPNcricinfo LtdEight of these players – including three uncapped ones – touched bids of INR 1 crore. Big-hitting, middle-order batter, Shahrukh Khan, got 55 bids, while left-arm spinner Sai Kishore got bids from six different teams.Thirteen players each were also picked from Karnataka and Delhi, the joint-most among the state teams.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus